Both Kubernetes and OpenShift help you manage containerized applications at scale, but they serve different types of teams and priorities. Kubernetes is the open-source engine behind modern app orchestration. OpenShift takes Kubernetes and adds tools, guardrails, and enterprise features on top.
If you’re trying to decide which platform fits your stack, this breakdown will help.
Understanding the Basics
Kubernetes is a container orchestration platform that automates the deployment, scaling, and management of containerized apps. It’s open-source, widely supported, and forms the foundation of most modern infrastructure.
OpenShift builds on Kubernetes and adds pre-integrated components like a container registry, developer tools, RBAC, GitOps pipelines, and policy controls. It’s backed by Red Hat and often chosen by enterprises that want a full-stack platform.
🧩 Persistent Storage That Scales with Kubernetes and OpenShift
Keep your stateful workloads fast, reliable, and easy to manage with NVMe-native storage built for containers.
👉 Use Simplyblock for Persistent Storage for Kubernetes →
Kubernetes – Flexible and Fully Customizable
Kubernetes gives you unmatched flexibility to build the platform you want. But that freedom comes with complexity. You’ll need to stitch together monitoring, logging, security, CI/CD, and other tooling yourself, or rely on a managed Kubernetes service like GKE or EKS.
It’s a great choice for teams that want full control and have the resources to manage it. The Kubernetes architecture provides the core components for scheduling, service discovery, and scaling.
For teams running database-on-Kubernetes, Kubernetes offers tight control over pod placement, resource limits, and scaling logic.
🔹 Where Kubernetes Works Best
- Custom platform engineering
- DevOps-first organizations
- Cloud-native workloads on public or hybrid clouds
- Teams using Helm, Kustomize, ArgoCD, and other CNCF tools
OpenShift – Enterprise-Grade Kubernetes Out of the Box
OpenShift is Kubernetes, pre-packaged with all the extras. That includes a built-in container registry, service mesh, security policy enforcement, and automation pipelines. It also brings a polished UI and tighter defaults that help enforce consistency and compliance.
For enterprises running containerized apps at scale — especially in regulated environments — OpenShift helps reduce risk and complexity. The OpenShift platform includes features designed for hybrid deployment, RBAC, and multi-tenancy.
If you’re working with Kubernetes backup, OpenShift environments offer better PVC and volume snapshot management built in.
🔹 Where OpenShift Makes Sense
- Large organizations with strict governance needs
- Teams that want guardrails and less manual setup
- Consistent CI/CD pipelines and RBAC across clusters
- Hybrid and multi-cloud deployments at scale
Kubernetes vs OpenShift Breakdown
Both platforms handle container orchestration, but they differ in setup, management, and built-in features. This breakdown highlights what sets them apart across core operational areas.
| Category | Kubernetes | OpenShift |
| Open Source | Yes | Kubernetes-based, maintained by Red Hat |
| Installation | Manual setup or managed service (GKE, EKS, etc.) | Streamlined with the installer and default stack |
| Dev Tools Included | No – needs third-party tools | Built-in CI/CD pipelines, registry, and developer portal |
| RBAC & Security | Configurable manually | Enterprise-grade policy controls with tighter defaults |
| Cost | Free to use (infra costs only) | Subscription for enterprise features and support |
| Best For | Teams building custom platforms | Enterprises needing a turnkey container platform |
Bringing Scalable Storage to Kubernetes and OpenShift
Simplyblock works natively with both Kubernetes and OpenShift through its CSI driver. It brings high-performance NVMe-over-TCP block storage to stateful workloads — whether you’re deploying via kubectl or OpenShift Pipelines.
It also supports use cases like reduction of RPO/RTO with fast snapshots, dynamic provisioning, and failover-ready design.
- Built-in support for volume autoscaling and cloning
- Multi-zone durability for databases, logging, and CI/CD
- Designed for high-availability workloads with persistent storage demands
Which Platform Makes Sense for Your Workloads
Kubernetes gives you control and flexibility to build your platform your way — ideal for DevOps-centric teams. OpenShift offers a more structured, pre-integrated experience that helps large teams move fast with fewer setup risks.
Whichever path you take, Simplyblock ensures your software-defined storage layer is built for scale, performance, and simplicity.
Questions and answers
Kubernetes is an open-source container orchestration framework, while OpenShift is a Kubernetes-based platform with added developer tools, CI/CD pipelines, and security features. OpenShift enhances vanilla Kubernetes with enterprise-grade integrations and policy controls. See how Simplyblock supports Kubernetes-native storage for both platforms.
No. OpenShift builds on Kubernetes but doesn’t replace it. It packages Kubernetes with an opinionated stack including a developer console, OperatorHub, and integrated security. Both can coexist, and Simplyblock integrates seamlessly via CSI and API-based provisioning.
For enterprises, OpenShift offers built-in security policies, authentication, and role-based access control. Kubernetes is more flexible but requires manual setup of these features. Simplyblock supports both with multi-tenant quality of service for isolated workloads.
Yes. Simplyblock provides CSI-based volumes that work with both Kubernetes and OpenShift clusters. It supports stateful workloads like databases across both platforms using NVMe-over-TCP, snapshots, and encryption.
OpenShift is easier for teams without deep DevOps expertise due to its built-in UI, deployment pipelines, and pre-configured components. Kubernetes gives you more control but requires more configuration. Either way, Simplyblock simplifies persistent storage with Kubernetes-native CSI integration.