Skip to main content

Block Storage CSI

Terms related to simplyblock

NVMe Partitioning CSI Topology Awareness IO Path Optimization Kubernetes Node Affinity Storage Composability Software-Defined Everything Object Locking Log-Structured Merge Tree Read Amplification Write Amplification Cross-Zone Replication Cross-Cluster Replication Zonal vs Regional Storage Storage Affinity in Kubernetes Storage Orchestration Hot vs Cold Data Cold Storage Tier Multi-Cloud Storage Stateful Application in Kubernetes CSI Snapshot Controller Zero Copy Clone Thin Cloning Storage Rebalancing Hybrid Erasure Coding DRAID Fibre Channel over Ethernet KVM Storage KVM RoCEv2 NVMe Subsystem NVMe-oF Discovery Controller NVMe Multipathing NVMe Namespace OpenShift Data Foundation vs Ceph OpenShift Data Foundation VMware vSphere OpenShift Virtualization KubeVirt and Kubernetes Virtualization Kubernetes vs Virtual Machines Block Storage CSI VMware Tanzu Network Storage Performance In-network computing Intel E2200 IPU NVIDIA BlueField DPU DPU vs GPU vSwitch / OVS offload on DPU Network offload on DPUs NVMe-oF target on DPU Storage virtualization on DPU Storage offload on DPUs Local Node Affinity Persistent Storage Storage Area Network NVMe Persistent Volume Claim Persistent Volume PCIe-Based DPU SmartNIC vs DPU vs IPU SmartNIC Infrastructure Processing Unit Zero-Copy I/O Crush Maps Storage High Availability Asynchronous Storage Replication Synchronous Storage Replication NVMe over Fabrics using Fibre Channel NVMe/RDMA Openshift Container Storage Kubernetes Block Storage Observability Tail Latency Replication Storage Virtualization Helm Chart NFS HostPath RADOS Block Device (RBD) XFS Modern Apps vSAN Database Branching Flash Storage Array RTO RPO TCO SLO SLA Fault Tolerance PCI Express SAS SATA Fibre Channel DPU InfiniBand Storage Pools Storage Controller Snapshot vs Clone in Storage Dynamic Provisioning in Kubernetes Erasure Coding Data Replication Hybrid Cloud Storage Storage Quality of Service (QoS) Kubernetes StatefulSet Object Storage vs Block Storage Storage Tiering Block Storage Volume Snapshotting Container Storage Interface Hyper-Converged Storage Disaggregated Storage MAUS Architecture NVMe over RoCE NVMe over FC Blockbridge StorPool Portworx Lightbits Labs Valkey LINBIT RAID Software-Defined Storage (SDS) RDMA DPDK ISCSI SPDK Copy-On-Write (CoW) NVMe Latency Storage Latency IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) NVMe over TCP (NVMe/TCP) Thin Provisioning Distributed Storage System Write-Ahead Log (WAL) TiDB Interbase ArangoDB Memgraph TDengine Qdrant CouchDB Hazelcast DuckDB CockroachDB CrateDB SAP Hana Teradata Snowflake Databricks Weaviate Pinecone ScyllaDB Marqo RocksDB Aerospike Singlestore Timescale MariaDB Apache Cassandra Couchbase InfluxDB Neo4j Clickhouse Elasticsearch Redis MySQL Microsoft SQL Server Oracle MongoDB PostgreSQL Open-Source Storage MinIO Longhorn Amazon EBS Rook OpenEBS NVMe-oF Kubernetes OpenStack Ceph

Block Storage CSI (Container Storage Interface) is the Kubernetes mechanism for provisioning, attaching, and mounting block volumes (typically exposed as devices, then formatted and mounted) through a CSI driver instead of in-tree volume plugins. It standardizes how storage vendors integrate with Kubernetes, so platform teams can treat storage as an API, using StorageClass, PersistentVolume (PV), and PersistentVolumeClaim (PVC) workflows across on-prem, baremetal, and cloud environments.

A practical definition executives tend to use is: Block Storage CSI is the control plane contract that turns Kubernetes Storage requests into repeatable, auditable, policy-driven block volumes, including lifecycle operations like resize, snapshots, and topology-aware placement when supported by the driver.

Optimizing Block Storage CSI with Modern Solutions

The difference between “CSI is installed” and “CSI is optimized” is the storage backend architecture and the driver’s behavior under load. High-performing deployments reduce kernel overhead, avoid excess data copies, keep IO paths predictable, and isolate noisy neighbors via QoS. This is where Software-defined Block Storage platforms built on SPDK-style user-space IO paths can materially change CPU efficiency, tail latency, and throughput consistency.

For organizations standardizing Kubernetes Storage across business units, the optimization goal is usually predictable p95/p99 latency, stable IOPS ceilings per workload, and fast Day-2 operations (expansion, rebalancing, failure recovery) without “storage heroics.”

🚀 Provision Block Volumes with Block Storage CSI on NVMe/TCP
Use Simplyblock to run Software-defined Block Storage with CSI-driven provisioning and predictable performance at scale.
👉 Use Simplyblock for CSI-Based Kubernetes Storage →

Block Storage CSI in Kubernetes Storage

In Kubernetes Storage, Block Storage CSI is the bridge between the scheduler-driven pod lifecycle and persistent data lifecycles. A StorageClass expresses policy (replication/erasure coding, encryption, topology, performance intent), a PVC declares demand, and the CSI controller/node components reconcile the request into an attached device on the right node, at the right time.

Where teams get surprised is that “same YAML” does not mean “same performance.” Node placement, CNI behavior, volume binding mode, filesystem choices, queue depths, and the storage protocol (iSCSI vs NVMe-oF vs NVMe/TCP) can each dominate results, especially for databases and log-heavy stateful services.

Block Storage CSI and NVMe/TCP

NVMe/TCP is a transport within NVMe-oF that extends NVMe semantics over standard Ethernet and TCP/IP, enabling disaggregated or hyper-converged designs without RDMA-specific fabrics. For Block Storage CSI, that typically means a CSI-provisioned volume maps to an NVMe namespace exposed over TCP, giving a cleaner IO path than legacy SCSI-based protocols in many environments.

In simplyblock deployments, NVMe/TCP is treated as a first-class dataplane option for Kubernetes Storage, pairing well with SPDK-based user-space processing to reduce kernel overhead and improve CPU efficiency per IO.

Block Storage CSI infographics
Block Storage CSI

Measuring and Benchmarking Block Storage CSI Performance

Benchmarking Block Storage CSI should isolate three layers: workload generator behavior, Kubernetes orchestration side effects, and storage dataplane characteristics. A common approach is running fio-based tests inside pods (or on dedicated benchmark nodes) while controlling variables like block size, read/write mix, number of jobs, and iodepth.

For executive reporting, avoid averages-only. Require p95/p99 latency, throughput, and IOPS stability across time, plus failure-mode testing (node drain, pod reschedule, link flap). simplyblock’s published performance testing, for example, uses fio with defined concurrency and queue depth, and reports scaling characteristics across cluster sizes.

Approaches for Improving Block Storage CSI Performance

  • Use NVMe/TCP or NVMe/RDMA backends where feasible so the block protocol matches NVMe parallelism rather than legacy SCSI semantics.
  • Enforce performance isolation with QoS-capable StorageClasses so a single workload cannot consume the entire device queue and destabilize other tenants.
  • Validate topology and binding behavior so volumes are provisioned where the pod will run, reducing cross-zone or cross-rack traffic that shows up as tail latency.
  • Tune fio and application queue depths to match the backend, because “more concurrency” can inflate p99 latency even when IOPS rise.
  • Prefer SPDK-style user-space dataplanes for CPU-efficient IO paths when your bottleneck is per-IO overhead rather than raw media bandwidth.

Block Storage CSI Architecture Options and Trade-Offs

The table below frames common Block Storage CSI approaches by the operational and performance trade-offs that matter in Kubernetes Storage programs.

ApproachDataplane characteristicsTypical strengthsTypical constraints
CSI + legacy iSCSI/SCSI backendKernel-heavy, SCSI semanticsBroad compatibilityHigher CPU per IO, tail latency sensitivity
CSI + NVMe/TCP backendNVMe semantics over EthernetStrong performance on standard networks, simpler opsNeeds solid network design for consistency
CSI + NVMe/RDMA backendRDMA bypasses network stackLowest latency potentialFabric/NIC complexity, operational rigor
Local-only (hostPath / ephemeral)Node-local IOVery low latency on one nodeWeak portability, fragile during reschedule
Software-defined Block Storage + CSI (SPDK-based)User-space, zero-copy orientedPredictable scaling, CPU efficiency, policy controlRDMA bypasses the network stack

Achieving Predictable Block Storage CSI Performance with Simplyblock™

Simplyblock™ targets predictable performance by coupling Kubernetes-native CSI control with an SPDK-based, user-space dataplane, then adding multi-tenancy and QoS so teams can set enforceable performance intent per volume. The result is a Software-defined Block Storage platform that supports flexible Kubernetes Storage deployment models, including hyper-converged and disaggregated layouts, so infrastructure teams can scale compute and storage independently when business units diverge in demand patterns.

If you need a practical starting point, simplyblock provides CSI installation and operational guidance in its documentation, including Helm-based deployment patterns and troubleshooting references.

Future Directions and Advancements in Block Storage CSI

Block Storage CSI is trending toward deeper policy and automation: richer volume health signals, standardized snapshot/clone workflows, tighter topology integration for multi-zone scheduling, and better support for disaggregated NVMe-oF designs (including NVMe/TCP) that keep latency predictable while scaling out.

On the hardware side, DPUs/IPUs and in-network offload patterns are increasingly relevant because they reduce host CPU overhead and help stabilize tail latency when clusters run at high consolidation ratios.

Teams often review these glossary pages alongside Block Storage CSI when they standardize Kubernetes Storage and Software-defined Block Storage.

Container Storage Interface (CSI)
Dynamic Provisioning in Kubernetes
Kubernetes Block Storage
NVMe over TCP

Questions and Answers

What is Block Storage CSI in Kubernetes?

Block Storage CSI (Container Storage Interface) allows Kubernetes to provision and manage block-level storage volumes dynamically. It provides persistent storage for stateful apps like databases, making it essential for Kubernetes-native storage deployments.

How does a block storage CSI driver differ from file or object storage?

A Block Storage CSI driver provides raw volumes for applications to format and mount, offering better performance and lower latency than file or object storage. It’s ideal for workloads like databases on Kubernetes and analytics engines.

Can NVMe over TCP be used with a Block Storage CSI driver?

Yes, NVMe/TCP can be integrated with a CSI-compatible block storage backend. This enables ultra-fast persistent volumes with high IOPS and low latency, especially in cloud-native environments using CSI-based provisioning.

How does Simplyblock support block storage via CSI in Kubernetes?

Simplyblock offers a high-performance CSI driver that provisions NVMe-based block storage with data-at-rest encryption and snapshot support. It integrates seamlessly with Kubernetes, ensuring scalability and performance.

Which workloads benefit most from block storage using CSI drivers?

Block Storage CSI is ideal for workloads that require consistent, low-latency I/O—such as PostgreSQL, MongoDB, and time-series databases. It supports stateful containers and ensures fast, reliable volume access across nodes.