top of page

Open Source Storage: Pros and Cons with a Focus on Kubernetes and Cloud Block Storage

What is open source storage?

Open source storage refers to storage software or systems released under an open-source license, allowing users to freely access, modify, and distribute the source code. This fosters collaborative development, innovation, and flexibility in storage solutions for developers.

Key benefits of open source storage:

  • Cost-Effectiveness: Open source storage eliminates licensing fees, allowing organizations to allocate more resources to hardware and infrastructure, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious businesses.

  • Customizability: With access to the source code, organizations can tailor open-source storage to meet their specific requirements, providing greater flexibility and adaptability.

  • Community Support: Open-source projects benefit from a vibrant community of developers and users who actively contribute to bug fixes, improvements, and knowledge sharing.

  • Transparency and Security: The open-source nature allows for increased transparency, enabling organizations to review the code for potential security vulnerabilities.

  • Scalability: Many open-source storage solutions are designed to scale with ease, accommodating growing data needs without significant cost implications.

 

Downsides/Limitations of Open Source Storage:

  • Lack of Official Support: While open-source communities provide support, it may not match the level of dedicated customer support available with commercial storage solutions.

  • Complexity for Some Users: Customizability may come at the cost of increased complexity, making open-source storage less user-friendly for those with limited technical expertise.

  • Feature Variability: Open-source storage solutions may not offer the same comprehensive feature set as some proprietary solutions, impacting specific use cases.

  • Integration Challenges: Open-source storage solutions might face challenges when integrating with certain proprietary applications or hardware, requiring custom development or workarounds.

  • Limited Vendor Accountability: With open-source storage, there might be less vendor accountability for issues, as the responsibility for support and maintenance largely falls on the user or the community.

  • Dependency on Community: The sustainability and development pace of open-source projects depend on the engagement of the community. If a project loses community support, it could impact the future development and support for the solution.

  • Lack of Unified User Interface: In some cases, open-source storage solutions might lack a unified user interface, leading to a fragmented user experience when compared to commercial solutions.

Pricing: Open source vs vendor-supported storage

When comparing open-source storage with proprietary options, it's essential to consider both upfront costs and ongoing expenses. Open-source storage solutions typically offer lower initial investment due to no licensing fees. However, proprietary solutions might provide enhanced features, dedicated support, and integration with other products, which could lead to a higher overall cost of ownership. In order to use open-source software in mission-critical production environment, it is normally required and recommended to purchase enterprise support options, which altogether can lead to higher TCO and lower support levels than in case of vendor-supported storage.

Open Source Storage in Kubernetes Environments

Kubernetes has popularized the use of persistent volumes (PVs) and storage classes to manage storage in containerized environments. These components, along with the Container Storage Interface (CSI) driver, play a crucial role in integrating open-source storage solutions with Kubernetes.

  • Persistent Volumes (PVs): These are storage resources in a Kubernetes cluster that remain available beyond the lifecycle of individual pods, ensuring data persistence.

  • Storage Classes: These define different types of storage available in a Kubernetes cluster, allowing dynamic provisioning of persistent volumes with specific characteristics.

  • CSI Driver: This standard interface allows Kubernetes to expose arbitrary storage systems to containerized workloads.

List of open source storage solutions

  1. Ceph (https://ceph.io/): Ceph is a widely adopted open-source distributed storage platform that provides object, block, and file storage capabilities. It offers high scalability, fault tolerance, and seamless integration with cloud platforms and virtualization environments. Read more about Ceph.

  2. GlusterFS (https://www.gluster.org/): GlusterFS is an open-source distributed file system designed to handle large-scale data storage. It allows users to combine multiple storage servers into a single, unified global namespace, making it easier to manage and scale storage resources.

  3. OpenEBS (https://openebs.io/): OpenEBS is a container-native open-source storage solution that provides persistent block storage for Kubernetes environments. It leverages Kubernetes' native features to deliver reliable and scalable storage for stateful applications. Read more about OpenEBS.

  4. MinIO (https://min.io/): MinIO, as mentioned in a previous article, is a high-performance open-source object storage system built for cloud-native environments. It provides S3-compatible API support, making it an attractive option for cloud-native applications. Read more about MinIO.

  5. Longhorn (https://longhorn.io/): Longhorn is an open-source, cloud-native block storage system designed specifically for Kubernetes environments. It offers features like dynamic provisioning, data replication, and snapshots for stateful applications in Kubernetes clusters. Read more about Longhorn.

  6. Rook (https://rook.io/): Rook is an open-source storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing a seamless integration of various storage solutions like Ceph, EdgeFS, and NFS into Kubernetes environments. Read more about Rook.

Conclusion

While open source storage is an attractive option for small non-production workloads, oftenwise it fails to deliver reliability at scale.  Solutions like Longhorn are often not considered production-ready and opting for a supported storage version may provide additional features, dedicated support, and integration advantages with platforms such as AWS. This balance allows businesses to choose based on their specific needs for reliability, performance, and operational ease.

Simplyblock: NVMe-Optimized Cloud Block Storage

Simplyblock is the NVMe-optimized software-defined cloud block storage, enabling storage requirements for the most demanding workloads on AWS. High IOPS per Gigabyte density, low predictable latency, and high throughput is enabled using the pooled storage, as well as our distributed data placement algorithm. Using erasure coding (a better RAID) instead of replicas helps to minimize storage overhead without sacrificing data safety and fault tolerance.

Learn about open source components in simplyblock cloud block storage system.

bottom of page